When something goes wrong at an association, the board made the decision and the manager gets asked why they did not catch it.
That is not always fair, and it is usually what happens. A CAM sits between a volunteer board with limited time and a set of vendors, contracts, and statutory obligations that have grown considerably more complex in the last three years. The board votes. The manager is the professional in the room.
This is a working list of what is worth verifying before a board commits — drawn from what actually produces disputes rather than from what a checklist template would include.
The Certificate Is Not the Endorsement
Every manager collects certificates of insurance from vendors. Fewer verify the document that actually matters.
A certificate of insurance is evidence that a policy existed on the day it was issued. It confers nothing on the association. It does not extend coverage, it does not obligate the carrier to notify anyone if the policy cancels, and it is out of date the moment anything changes.
What protects the association is an additional insured endorsement — an amendment to the vendor’s own policy naming the association. That is a separate document, it has to be requested from the vendor’s carrier, and it is what most association contracts actually require even when the manager is only collecting certificates.
Two related provisions worth requiring in the contract and confirming on the endorsement:
Waiver of subrogation, so the vendor’s carrier cannot pursue the association after paying a claim. Primary and non-contributory wording, so the vendor’s policy responds first rather than sharing with the association’s.
The practical version for a manager: when a contract requires additional insured status, ask for the endorsement rather than accepting the certificate. It takes one email to the vendor and it is the difference between the association being protected and believing it is.
Expiration Is Where Files Fail
The association that has a problem is rarely the one that never asked for a certificate. It is the one that asked once.
Policies cancel mid-term for non-payment. Carriers non-renew. Vendors change insurers without telling anyone. A certificate collected at contract signing proves nothing three years later, and a vendor working without current coverage is a vendor whose injured employee may look to the association.
Tracking expiration dates is unglamorous and it is one of the clearest ways a manager demonstrates value. Property management companies generally handle this well; self-managed associations frequently do not, which is worth knowing when you take over an account.
Workers’ Compensation Exemptions Cover the Owner, Not the Crew
Florida allows certain business owners to file an exemption from workers’ compensation coverage, and in the trades associations use most — landscaping, cleaning, pressure washing, handyman work — exemptions are common.
Two things about them that catch managers out.
An exemption covers the person named on it and nobody else. A vendor with a valid exemption and four employees working on association property still needs coverage for those four. The exemption does not extend to them.
Exemptions expire. They are valid for a period and must be renewed, and an expired exemption in the file is the same as no exemption at all.
Where a vendor has no coverage and one of their people is injured on association property, the injured worker’s path to recovery may run through the association. A manager who collected proof and can produce it is in a very different position from one who took someone’s word.
The Scope Boundary Nobody Writes Down
This one produces more vendor disputes than any insurance question.
A landscaping contract that does not say who handles tree work above a certain height. A cleaning contract silent on pressure washing. A maintenance agreement that does not distinguish between repair and replacement. A pool company whose scope stops at the water and does not include the deck.
Vendors fill those gaps informally until something goes wrong, at which point the contract is read carefully for the first time. And the insurance follows the same gap — many landscaping policies restrict tree work by height, many cleaning policies exclude certain equipment, and a vendor doing work outside their declared operations may be uninsured for it.
Writing the boundary into the scope protects the association twice: it prevents the dispute, and it makes clear when a separate, appropriately insured contractor is required.
The Reserve Study and the Milestone Inspection Are Now Underwriting Documents
This is the change most managers have felt without necessarily seeing the whole picture.
Milestone inspection requirements and structural integrity reserve studies were introduced as safety and financial-planning measures. They have since become insurability documents. Citizens Property Insurance is prohibited from issuing or renewing policies where an association has not complied, and private carriers have moved in the same direction. Associations submit SIRS data to the state, and that data is visible to lenders and insurers.
For a manager, three consequences follow.
Compliance status affects the association’s ability to obtain property coverage, not just its exposure to a fine. It affects individual unit owners, whose own policies and whose buyers’ financing both depend on the building’s standing. And it affects the board’s D&O exposure, because a board that received an engineer’s report and deferred acting on it has created a record.
A manager who tracks compliance deadlines the way they track certificate expirations is managing an insurance risk as much as a regulatory one.
D&O Deserves a Direct Question at Every Transition
Board turnover is constant, and new directors rarely ask whether they are covered before agreeing to serve.
Three things worth confirming for any association you manage, and worth raising when a board changes.
Whether D&O coverage exists at all. An association that cannot answer has identified a problem rather than avoided one.
Whether it extends to volunteers, committee members, and the management company — not only elected directors. Committee volunteers make real decisions, and management companies are frequently named alongside boards.
Whether the insured versus insured exclusion carves out claims by unit owners. Many D&O forms exclude claims brought by one insured against another. In an association the most common dispute is owner-versus-board, which means without that carve-back the most likely claim is excluded.
That third point is the one most often missed, and it is the one that matters most.
Where the Manager’s Own Exposure Sits
Worth stating plainly, because managers think about the association’s coverage more than their own.
A management company faces claims from two directions. From owners and boards, alleging vendor selection, maintenance decisions, lease or rule administration, accounting for funds, or failure to advise. From residents, alleging habitability, screening, or fair housing issues.
Two coverages respond, and they are different. Errors and omissions addresses the professional decisions. Crime and fidelity addresses funds held on behalf of associations — operating accounts, reserves, and assessment collections — which errors and omissions does not reach.
And the exposure growing fastest is neither. Social engineering fraud, where someone impersonating a board member, a vendor, or a colleague redirects a payment, sits between the two policies and is frequently covered by neither without a specific endorsement. Management companies move association money on regular schedules, which is exactly the pattern these schemes exploit.
The controls that prevent it are dual approval on transfers and voice verification of any changed banking instruction, using a number you already had rather than one contained in the request.
A Working List
Things worth verifying, in rough order of how often they cause problems:
-
Additional insured endorsements, not just certificates, from every vendor
-
Certificate and exemption expiration dates, tracked rather than filed
-
Workers’ compensation coverage for vendor employees, not just the owner
-
Scope boundaries written into contracts, particularly around tree work, pressure washing, and repair versus replacement
-
Milestone inspection and reserve study compliance status and deadlines
-
D&O coverage confirmed, extending to committees and the manager, with the owner-claim carve-back
-
Storm response terms negotiated into vendor contracts before June
-
Your own errors and omissions, crime, and social engineering coverage
A Note on Why We Wrote This
Prestige Insurance Group works with community associations, management companies, and the vendors that serve them across Florida. We wrote this because the questions above come up constantly in our work with boards and managers, and because most of them are answered by reading a document rather than by buying anything.
If you manage associations and want a second set of eyes on the vendor certificates in a file, we are glad to review them against the contracts at no cost, whether or not we write the association’s coverage. It is a useful exercise and it usually finds two or three things.
Miami 305-969-8776 · Orlando 407-993-2331 · Stuart 772-247-3788
Related Reading
General information only, not legal advice. Florida statutory requirements for milestone inspections, structural integrity reserve studies, and workers’ compensation exemptions change over time. Confirm current requirements with qualified counsel and the applicable agency.
